Jessie M. Simmons
Dr. Frances Haithcock
According to Section 1116(c)(10)(C) of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, the state
education agency must implement at least one of a set of actions listed in the law for any local
educational agency identified for corrective action. The Florida Department of Education, with
approval by the State Board of Education, chose to implement the first of those options for the
2006-2007 school year and will continue this practice for the 2008-2009 school year.
The state has determined that the most appropriate action at this time is to reduce
administrative funds and will implement this action by placing a cap on the amount of indirect
costs that can be charged to the Title I, Part A project for 2008-2009.
The cap on each district’s indirect funds is determined by applying the percentage of adequate
yearly progress or AYP criteria met to the district’s approved indirect cost rate. The resulting
percentage is applied as an indirect cost cap to be applied to the Title I, Part A project. For
example: If the district met 85 percent of possible AYP criteria and the approved indirect cost
rate for that district is 4.5 percent, the cap on indirect cost which can be charged to the project is
3.825 percent. The capped rate will be applied to all eligible expenditures from the Title I, Part
A award throughout the project period and must be reflected on the final FA 399 submitted at
the end of the effective period.
Please find attached a report prepared by the Bureau of Contracts, Grants, and Procurement
that specifies the calculations applied to the Title I, Part A project for each local educational
agency.
325 W. GAINES STREET • SUITE 514 • TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-0400 • (850) 245-0509 • www.fldoe.org
from administrative use to activities that are specifically designed to address the areas in which
the district did not make AYP. The attached review sheet will assist in determining appropriate
activities.
These funds will be subtracted from the Title I, Part A award and an amended Project Award
Notification issued. The funds will be re-awarded in a separate Title I, Part A Corrective Action
Award. In order to receive these funds, the district or local educational agency must complete
award. Please limit submissions to no more than five pages. Descriptions must include
the names of each Title I school to be impacted, the target subgroups, the activities to be
conducted, and an explanation of how the district expects to achieve AYP using these
and other available resources.
If you have questions or need additional information, please contact your Title I Office Program
Specialist at 850.245.0414.
Thank you for your leadership in ensuring the highest quality educational program for our
students.
Title I, Part A, 2008-09 Sanctions for District Corrective Action Distribution Table
FINAL
20% - Choice with
FINAL
AGENCY
School Districts
TITLE I,
Transportation
AYP
ALLOCATION
NUMBERS
PART A
and SES
SANCTIONS
FY 2007-08
FY 2008-09
2229A
2289A
2129A
Approved
Indirect
Allocations
TAPS 09A048
TAPS 09A024
TAPS 09A001
Indirect
Cost
40-90-20-R2
40-90-20-D1
40-90-20-B2
Rate
Cap Rate
010
ALACHUA
6,856,148
1,371,230
44,197
5,440,721
3.74
2.88
015
P.K. YONGE SCHOOL
111,595
0
0
111,595
5.00
5.00
020
BAKER
808,192
0
5,136
803,056
6.89
5.99
030
BAY
5,826,136
1,165,227
33,248
4,627,661
3.60
2.84
040
BRADFORD
845,454
169,091
8,378
667,985
4.29
2.96
050
BREVARD
12,695,668
2,539,134
51,388
10,105,146
3.58
3.04
060
BROWARD
60,164,632
12,032,926
595,117
47,536,589
5.95
4.58
070
CALHOUN
553,053
110,611
2,733
439,709
4.49
3.82
080
CHARLOTTE
2,413,627
482,725
11,288
1,919,614
4.95
4.31
090
CITRUS
3,985,645
797,129
37,348
3,151,168
5.59
4.30
100
CLAY
3,128,640
625,728
9,905
2,493,007
3.23
2.81
110
COLLIER
6,206,813
1,241,363
53,039
4,912,411
3.42
2.29
120
COLUMBIA
2,828,898
565,780
9,556
2,253,562
3.46
3.01
130
DADE
128,133,255
25,626,651
873,105
101,633,499
4.39
3.47
140
DESOTO
1,803,583
360,717
23,278
1,419,588
5.33
3.57
150
DIXIE
780,097
156,019
4,616
619,462
6.35
5.52
160
DUVAL
30,270,869
6,054,174
299,401
23,917,294
4.78
3.44
170
ESCAMBIA
13,234,200
2,646,840
124,603
10,462,757
4.93
3.65
180
FLAGLER
1,305,255
261,051
5,987
1,038,217
2.60
2.00
190
FRANKLIN
384,762
76,952
4,677
303,133
5.36
3.70
200
GADSDEN
2,208,814
441,763
1,767,051
0.00
0.00
210
GILCHRIST
565,643
113,129
1,835
450,679
4.39
3.95
220
GLADES
322,181
64,436
707
257,038
2.95
2.66
230
GULF
450,287
90,057
1,791
358,439
3.52
2.99
240
HAMILTON
743,614
148,723
6,924
587,967
3.42
2.19
250
HARDEE
1,934,336
290,150
18,724
1,625,462
3.90
2.61
260
HENDRY
2,470,451
494,090
23,392
1,952,969
3.81
2.55
270
HERNANDO
4,523,378
904,676
29,535
3,589,167
3.08
2.22
Florida Department of Education
Office of Grants Management
Gwendolyn Jackson - 9/08/08
Title I, Part A, 2008-09 Sanctions for District Corrective Action Distribution Table
280
HIGHLANDS
4,033,504
806,701
30,211
3,196,592
3.85
2.85
290
HILLSBOROUGH
45,936,358
9,187,272
299,303
36,449,783
3.79
2.92
300
HOLMES
1,121,411
224,282
7,248
889,881
6.00
5.10
310
INDIAN RIVER
3,088,195
617,639
34,839
2,435,717
4.93
3.40
320
JACKSON
1,726,417
345,283
13,412
1,367,722
4.01
2.97
330
JEFFERSON
474,398
94,880
7,581
371,937
7.26
5.01
340
LAFAYETTE
365,770
73,154
591
292,025
4.46
4.24
350
LAKE
7,201,656
1,440,331
49,386
5,711,939
3.49
2.58
360
LEE
13,362,775
2,672,555
95,405
10,594,815
3.65
2.70
370
LEON
6,578,387
1,315,677
0
5,262,710
7.11
7.11
685
FAMU LAB SCHOOL
69,806
13,961
537
55,308
5.00
3.95
686
FSU LAB SCHOOL
259,362
0
0
259,362
5.00
5.00
380
LEVY
1,931,436
216,287
16,973
1,698,176
3.79
2.62
390
LIBERTY
294,458
58,892
2,913
232,653
4.77
3.43
400
MADISON
1,018,925
203,785
10,280
804,860
5.30
3.92
410
MANATEE
7,821,471
1,564,294
92,018
6,165,159
5.77
4.15
420
MARION
11,522,125
2,304,425
103,816
9,113,884
4.69
3.47
430
MARTIN
2,321,389
464,278
15,128
1,841,983
3.78
2.91
440
MONROE
1,302,859
260,572
13,850
1,028,437
5.19
3.74
450
NASSAU
1,144,567
228,913
5,977
909,677
3.91
3.21
460
OKALOOSA
4,407,823
881,565
24,850
3,501,408
4.23
3.47
470
OKEECHOBEE
1,656,143
331,229
13,506
1,311,408
3.47
2.39
480
ORANGE
40,311,616
8,062,323
331,934
31,917,359
3.93
2.83
490
OSCEOLA
9,591,646
1,918,329
114,132
7,559,185
4.19
2.60
500
PALM BEACH
37,689,470
7,537,894
180,188
29,971,388
2.99
2.36
687
HENDERSON SCHOOL
86,300
0
0
86,300
5.00
5.00
510
PASCO
11,431,983
2,286,397
104,161
9,041,425
3.68
2.47
520
PINELLAS
26,947,968
5,389,594
190,539
21,367,835
3.60
2.66
530
POLK
22,507,464
4,501,493
173,319
17,832,652
3.96
2.93
540
PUTNAM
4,427,860
0
42,815
4,385,045
3.55
2.27
550
ST. JOHNS
1,995,047
399,009
15,612
1,580,426
4.63
3.57
560
ST. LUCIE
8,581,158
1,716,232
76,221
6,788,705
3.24
2.07
570
SANTA ROSA
2,963,730
592,746
9,801
2,361,183
3.39
2.95
580
SARASOTA
5,573,247
1,114,649
44,398
4,414,200
5.17
4.08
Florida Department of Education
Office of Grants Management
Gwendolyn Jackson - 9/08/08
Title I, Part A, 2008-09 Sanctions for District Corrective Action Distribution Table
590
SEMINOLE
8,477,494
1,695,499
29,481
6,752,514
3.10
2.64
600
SUMTER
1,953,002
0
7,004
1,945,998
3.72
3.24
610
SUWANNEE
1,578,018
315,604
11,603
1,250,811
2.68
1.72
620
TAYLOR
817,840
163,568
6,411
647,861
4.04
2.99
630
UNION
406,884
0
3,330
403,554
4.25
3.15
640
VOLUSIA
12,995,870
2,599,174
136,681
10,260,015
4.27
2.86
650
WAKULLA
678,613
135,723
5,453
537,437
4.10
3.69
660
WALTON
1,592,420
318,484
11,033
1,262,903
3.53
2.61
670
WASHINGTON
885,973
177,195
12,116
696,662
6.10
4.21
557
SCHOOL DEAF/BLIND
192,093
38,419
4,594
149,080
10.76
7.21
TOTAL
614,880,157
$
121,098,679
$
4,628,558
$
489,152,920
$
489,152,920
$
No sanction penalty
Not required to offer NCLB Choice (No SINI Schools)
Non-Title I Funds for NCLB Choice
Pending Approved Indirect Cost Rate
Florida Department of Education
Office of Grants Management
Gwendolyn Jackson - 9/08/08
LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY
CORRECTIVE ACTION REVIEW
SCHOOL YEAR 2008-2009
Rev 9/11/08
1
Reviewer:
BUREAU OF STUDENT ASSISTANCE
Date:
District:
VERIFY INDIRECT COST
AMOUNT:
(AYP SANCTION AMOUNT)
VERIFY FORMS USED:
DOE 150 (Narrative)
DOE 101 (Budget)
Note:
No indirect costs are allowable
LEA PLAN
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT
PLANS
RELATES TO OTHER
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT
ACTIVITIES:
K-12 READING PLAN
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT
ASSISTANCE AND
INTERVENTION PLAN
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS
NARRATIVE REFLECTS THE USE OF AYP DATA TO DETERMINE NEED AND:
clearly identifies subgroups not meeting state proficiency targets – (district-level)
W
AA
H
Asian
Amer. Indian
SWD
ELL
ED
NOTE:
If not serving all subgroups - NAYP, must provide rationale (i.e., if prioritizing –
explain why)
c
learly explains or provides rationale if not serving all subgroups.
Math
Reading
clearly identifies content area(s) of need at
district-level
:
Writing
NOTE:
No content areas outside of those measured for AYP
The description provided clearly:
identifies all schools in corrective action/restructuring/in need of improvement
identifies subgroups not meeting state proficiency targets (for each school identified)
identifies areas of need; and
provides a brief description of what, when, where and how specific services/activities will
be used to (for each school identified)
:
CORRECTIVE ACTION REVIEW- SCHOOL YEAR 2008-2009
2
PRIMARY USES OF FUNDS ARE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED:
ADEQUATE
INFORMATION
PROVIDED
NEED MORE
INFORMATION
INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF:
Hire teachers to provide additional instructional staff
to target specific subgroups not meeting state
proficiency targets/AYP (i.e., ELL, SWD, etc.)
Hire teachers to provide additional instructional staff
to target specific content area(s) where district/schools
are not meeting AYP
Hire teachers to add additional instructional staff to
provide extended learning opportunities (tutoring,
extended services, etc.)
(
NOTE:
Services must be above and beyond current extended learning
opportunities/activities being provided via SES.)
Hire coaches in the specific content area(s) identified
Compensate teachers for additional hours of
instruction (describe purpose and rationale)
HIRE OTHER INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF (TEMPORARY PLACEMENT):
ADEQUATE
INFORMATION
PROVIDED
NEED MORE
INFORMATION
Use funds to pay for substitute teachers while teachers receive
professional development (describe purpose and rationale)
HIRE PARAPROFESSIONALS:
ADEQUATE
INFORMATION
PROVIDED
NEED MORE
INFORMATION
To provide additional instructional staff to target
specific subgroups not meeting AYP (i.e., ELL, SWD,
etc.)
To provide additional instructional staff to assist
teachers target specific content area(s)
To provide additional instructional staff to provide
extended learning opportunities (tutoring, extended
services)
PROVIDE TUTORING/EXTENDED LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES:
(ADDITIONAL ASSURANCES REQUIRED)
ADEQUATE
INFORMATION
PROVIDED
NEED MORE
INFORMATION
If applying to use funds for an extended day/Saturday
school/other type of tutoring program – districts must:
CORRECTIVE ACTION REVIEW- SCHOOL YEAR 2008-2009
3
o
attest that they are implementing SES with fidelity,
and
o
attest that the activities for which funds will be used
are directly aligned with the
subgroup
&
content
area
where the district did not make AYP.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: (
Specify how use of these funds
for PD goes beyond the 5% (HQ) and 10% (PD) that is already
required.
)
Description shows that
professional development:
ADEQUATE
INFORMATION
PROVIDED
NEED MORE
INFORMATION
is content-specific and will take place at the school or
district site (describe purpose and rationale)
is provided to classroom teachers and will take place at
the school or district site (describe purpose and
rationale)
is to develop school data teams or for teachers to do data
analysis and will take place at the school or district site
(describe purpose and rationale)
CONTRACT OUTSIDE EXPERTS/CONSULTANT:
ADEQUATE
INFORMATION
PROVIDED
NEED MORE
INFORMATION
content-specific and on school or district site (describe
purpose and rationale)
onsite providing training to teachers
no more than 20% of budget
MATERIALS, SUPPLIES, AND TECHNOLOGY:
ADEQUATE
INFORMATION
PROVIDED
NEED MORE
INFORMATION
content-specific and on school or district site
onsite providing training to teachers
no more than 20% of budget
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT:
ADEQUATE
INFORMATION
PROVIDED
NEED MORE
INFORMATION
Activities to be funded must be beyond the required
funding of 95% of 1% set-aside, to target appropriate
subgroup(s). Specific activities description should
CORRECTIVE ACTION REVIEW- SCHOOL YEAR 2008-2009
4
include:
o
numbers to be served
o
specific timeline of activities and oversight
o
method for ensuring that the activities are planned
in the home language and
o
what, when & where parents will attend
UNALLOWABLE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS:
ADEQUATE
INFORMAITON
PROVIDED
NEED MORE
INFORMATION
Statewide conferences
District conferences
Student transportation (bus drivers, fuel)
General supplies
Indirect costs
