FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
S
TATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
T. WILLARD FAIR,
Chairman
Members
DONNA G. CALLAWAY
DR. AKSHAY DESAI
ROBERTO MARTÍNEZ
PHOEBE RAULERSON
KATHLEEN SHANAHAN
LINDA K. TAYLOR
Jeanine Blomberg
Commissioner of Education
MEMORANDUM
Contact Information:
Karen Denbroeder
(850) 245-0475
karen.denbroeder@fldoe.org
TO:
District Accountability Coordinators
FROM:
Juan Copa, Director of Evaluation and Reporting
Bambi J. Lockman, Chief, Bureau of
Exceptional Education and Student Services
DATE:
May 29, 2007
SUBJECT:
1% Cap Requirement and Waiver Process
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with information on Florida’s
implementation of the 1% cap requirement for students with significant cognitive disabilities and
the district waiver process for exceeding the cap.
All students with disabilities must be assessed either using the Florida Comprehensive
Assessment Test (FCAT) or an alternate assessment. It is expected that the majority of students
with disabilities are assessed by the FCAT. Individual Educational Plan (IEP) teams must make
the appropriate determination of whether a student with disabilities should be assessed by the
FCAT or an alternate assessment based on the requirements defined in Rule 6A-1.0943, FAC,
and use of the Florida Alternate Assessment Participation Checklist.
DISTRICT WAIVER PROCESS
Under No Child Left Behind, states have the flexibility to count the proficient scores of students
with significant cognitive disabilities who take alternate assessment, as long as the number of
those proficient scores does not exceed 1% of all students in the grades assessed. In some
districts, the percent of students with disabilities who are proficient on alternate achievement
standards may exceed 1% of the total assessed population due to a large number of students with
325 W. GAINES STREET • TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-0400 • (850) 245-0505 • www.fldoe.org
District Accountability Coordinators
May 25, 2007
Page Two
significant cognitive disabilities served by the district. In such cases, the district may apply to the
state for a waiver.
Waiver consideration will be given to districts that:
•
House multi-district programs for students with significant cognitive disabilities
•
Are very small, such that a slight change in the number of students produces a large
change in the percent of students with significant cognitive disabilities
•
House high quality, research-based programs for students with significant cognitive
abilities that attract families from around the state and country
United States Department of Education (USDE) has provided guidance to states regarding a
state’s application for a waiver and has recommended that states use similar, rigorous criteria
with districts that wish to apply for a waiver. In general, the guidance indicates that the local
education agency (LEA) should provide evidence that explains why more than 1% of all students
in the LEA’s tested grades have the most significant cognitive disabilities and achieve
proficiency.
In order for a LEA waiver request to be considered, the following components
MUST
be
included:
•
An explanation of the circumstances that result in more than 1% of all students
districtwide having the most significant cognitive disabilities and achieving at the
proficient or advanced level on alternate achievement standards
•
Data showing the number of students participating in an alternate assessment by
disabilities
•
A complete description of the high-quality, research-based program for students with
significant cognitive disabilities
•
Data showing movement of students with the most significant cognitive disabilities from
other districts and states into programs in the LEA
•
Data confirming that the district houses a multi-district program for students with the
most significant cognitive disabilities, including the number of students from other
districts by disability
Without the required components, including data, the waiver request will not be considered.
Please send waiver requests to Bambi J. Lockman, Chief, Bureau of Exceptional Education and
Student Services, 325 West Gaines Street, Suite 614, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400, or via e-
mail at bambi.lockman@fldoe.org. If you have questions regarding the waiver process, please
contact Karen Denbroeder at (850) 245-0475 or via e-mail at karen.denbroeder@fldoe.org.
District Accountability Coordinators
May 25, 2007
Page Three
CALCULATION OF 1% CAP AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL
The following steps will be used to calculate 1% of students with disabilities taking the alternate
assessment that will be included in adequate yearly progress (AYP) proficiency calculations:
Step 1: Match Survey 2/3 membership file with all assessment records; determine 1% of all
matched records.
Step 2: Find all students with disabilities taking a reading alternate assessment; determine the
number of students scoring at proficient and advanced levels.
Step 3: Compare the numbers from Steps 1 and 2.
•
If the number of students that are proficient or advanced on the alternate
assessment (Step 2) is less than 1% of matched records (Step 1), then stop.
The district has met the 1% requirement.
•
If the number of students proficient or advanced on the alternate
assessment (Step 2) is more than 1% of matched records (Step 1), then all
students identified as specific learning disabled (SLD) who were reported
as proficient or advanced on alternate assessment will, for the purpose of
AYP, be reported as not proficient to meet the 1% requirement.
Step 4: Repeat with mathematics alternate assessments.
Step 5: Recalculate AYP results at the school level.
Students identified as specific learning disabled who are considered not proficient at the district
level because the district exceeded the 1% cap will also be considered not proficient at the school
level.
For questions regarding the calculation of the 1% cap, please contact Juan Copa at (850) 245-
0411 or e-mail at juan.copa@fldoe.org.
We appreciate your support and continued efforts in providing services to students with
disabilities.
JC/BJL/ml
cc: District School Superintendents
Exceptional Student Education Directors
Exceptional Student Education Alternate Assessment Coordinators
District Assessment Coordinators