1. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
    2. BETTY COXE
    3. CHARLIE CRISTDEPUTY COMMISSIONER
    4. CommissionerEDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS
    5. M E M O R A N D U M
      1. _
        1. _
          1. SUBJECT: Changes in the School Code Regarding Student Progression
          2. Comprehensive Program for Student Progression
          3. Allocation of Resources
          4. Assessment and Remediation
          5. Reading Deficiency and Parental Notification
          6. Elimination of Social Promotion
          7. Good Cause Exemptions from Mandatory Retention
          8. Annual Reports
          9. State Board Enforcement Authority and Responsibilities
          10. Department of Education Technical Assistance

 
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
BETTY COXE
 
CHARLIE CRIST
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
 
Commissioner
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS
 
 
 
CONTACT PERSONS
 
Name:
Mary Jo Butler
Name: Mike Tremor
Phone: (850) 48
8
-
6
726 Phone: (850) 487-8804
Suncom: 2
78
-
6
726 Suncom: 277-8804
E-mail:
E-mail:
:maryjo.butler@FLDOE.org michael.tremor@FLDOE.org
 
  
  
  
  
  
Name:
Ruth Gumm-Shearon
DPS: 03-024
 
  
Phone:
  
  
  
  
(850)
487-3506
  
Suncom:
  
  
  
277-3506
     
 
  
  
  
  
  
E-mail: ruth.gumm@FLDOE.org
 
 
M E M O R A N D U M
 
TO:
School District School Superintendents
 
FROM:
Betty Coxe
 
DATE:
August 26, 2002
SUBJECT: Changes in the School Code Regarding Student Progression
 
Senate Bill 20E, passed by the Legislature in May 2002, revises the Florida School Code
effective January 7, 2003. Included in the revisions are changes to the requirements for school
district pupil progression plans, now called student progression plans. The policy interpretations
provided in this memorandum supersede all previous policy memoranda regarding pupil/student
progression. These changes will be in effect for student promotion at the end of the 2002-2003
school year. School districts should incorporate these statutory changes into school district policy
by revising the student progression plan so that it will be effective for the 2002-2003 school year.
Unchanged is the intent of the Legislature that each student's progression from one grade to
another be determined, in part, upon proficiency in reading, writing, science, and mathematics;
that school board policies facilitate such proficiency; and that each student and his or her parent
be informed of that student's academic progress.
PLAZA LEVEL – 08, THE CAPITOL – TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0400 – (850) 413-0555 – FAX (850) 488-2869
http:/www.firn.edu/doe
An affirmative action/equal opportunity employer
 

 
August 26, 2002
Page Two
 
 
Comprehensive Program for Student Progression
 
Each school district must continue using a comprehensive program for student progression that
includes:
 
 
standards for evaluating each student's performance, including mastery of the Sunshine State
Standards
(no change)
 
 
specific levels of performance in reading, writing, science, and mathematics for each grade
level that includes, where appropriate, the levels of performance on statewide assessments
defined by the Commissioner of Education below in which a student must receive
remediation or be retained
(no change)
 
 
for a student who has been retained, provision of an intensive program that is different from
the previous year's program and that takes into account the student's learning style;
(no
change)
 
 
appropriate alternative placement for a student who has been retained two or more years.
(Previously the law required only that school districts consider such alternative placement.
It is now required.)
 
Allocation of Resources
 
A new provision requires school districts to allocate remedial and supplemental instruction
resources to students in the following priority:
 
first, to students who are deficient in reading by the end of grade three
 
next, to students who fail to meet performance levels required for promotion.
 
Assessment and Remediation
 
Each student must participate in the statewide assessment program.
Each
student who does not
meet specific levels of performance in reading, writing, science, and mathematics for
each
grade,
as determined by:
 
the school district, or
  
 
the Commissioner of Education for grades with statewide assessments
PLAZA LEVEL – 08, THE CAPITOL – TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0400 – (850) 413-0555 – FAX (850) 488-2869
http:/www.firn.edu/doe
An affirmative action/equal opportunity employer
 

 
August 26, 2002
Page Three
 
 
 
must be provided with additional diagnostic assessments to determine the nature of the student's
difficulty and areas of academic need.
 
For
each
student with identified and diagnosed deficiencies, the school must develop, in
consultation with the student's parent, and
must implement
an academic improvement plan (AIP)
to assist the student in meeting state and district expectations for proficiency.
 
Beginning with the 2002-2003 school year, if the student,
at any grade
, has been identified as
having a deficiency in reading, the AIP must identify the following:
1.
 
the student's specific areas of deficiency in
 
phonemic awareness
 
phonics
 
fluency
 
comprehension
 
vocabulary
2.
 
the desired levels of performance in these areas
3.
 
the instructional and support services to be provided to help the student achieve the desired
levels of performance.
 
Schools must also provide for frequent monitoring of the student's progress. The Commissioner
of Education has determined the following levels of performance for student progression.
 
Students who score at achievement Level 1
 
on the Florida Comprehensive Assessement
Test (FCAT) Sunshine State Standards tests in reading and mathematics in grades 3-10
 
will be required to receive remediation through an AIP or be retained, as determined by the
district student progression plan. Retention decisions should be based on more than a single
test score.
 
 
Students who score lower than 3 on
 
the FCAT writing tests at grades 4, 8, and 10
will be
required to receive remediation through an AIP or be retained, as determined by the district
student progression plan.
Retention decisions should be based on more than a single test
score.
 
Remedial instruction provided during high school may not be in lieu of English and mathematics
credits required for graduation. While not addressed in the law, best practice indicates that
middle- and high-school English courses are not appropriate for the remediation of reading
difficulties since these courses are designed to address other critical knowledge and skills besides
basic reading proficiency.
 
PLAZA LEVEL – 08, THE CAPITOL – TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0400 – (850) 413-0555 – FAX (850) 488-2869
http:/www.firn.edu/doe
An affirmative action/equal opportunity employer
 

 
August 26, 2002
Page Four
 
 
 
Upon subsequent evaluation after remediation, if the documented deficiency has not been
remediated in accordance with the AIP, the student
may
be retained. Each student who does not
meet the minimum performance expectations defined by the Commissioner of Education for the
statewide assessment tests in reading, writing, science, and mathematics must continue to be
provided with remedial or supplemental instruction until the expectations are met or the student
graduates from high school or is not subject to compulsory school attendance.
 
Reading Deficiency and Parental Notification
 
In the new law, the Legislature expresses its goal that every student read at or above grade level.
Any student who exhibits a substantial deficiency in reading, based on teacher observations or
local or state assessments conducted in grades K-3
must
be given
intensive
reading instruction
immediately following the identification of the reading deficiency. The student's reading
proficiency must be reassessed by locally determined assessments or through teacher
observations at the beginning of the grade following the intensive reading instruction. The
student must continue to be provided with intensive reading instruction until the reading
deficiency is remedied.
(No change)
 
 
New language provides that beginning with the 2002-2003 school year, the parent of any student
in grades K-3 who exhibits a substantial reading deficiency must be notified in writing of the
following:
 
 
that the child has been identified as having a substantial reading deficiency
 
a description of the current services that are provided to the child
 
a description of the proposed supplemental instructional services and supports that will be
provided to the child that are designed to remediate the identified area of reading deficiency
 
that if the child's reading deficiency is not remediated by the end of grade 3, the child must
be retained unless exempted from mandatory retention for good cause.
 
Beginning with the 2002-2003 school year, if the student's reading deficiency is not remedied by
the end of grade 3, as demonstrated by scoring at Level 2 or higher on the grade 3 reading
portion of the FCAT Sunshine State Standards, the student
must
be retained, unless exempted for
good cause.
(The change moves the reading promotion gateway from grade 4 to grade 3 and
places in statute the FCAT level requiring retention.)
 
PLAZA LEVEL – 08, THE CAPITOL – TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0400 – (850) 413-0555 – FAX (850) 488-2869
http:/www.firn.edu/doe
An affirmative action/equal opportunity employer
 

 
August 26, 2002
Page Five
 
 
 
Elimination of Social Promotion
 
The law continues to require that no student may be assigned to a grade level based solely on age
or other factors that constitute social promotion. This also prevents administrative placement
that is without regard to the student’s proficiency. Grade 3 reading proficiency is now the state
focus of accountability for no social promotion, but no student who is not ready for the more
difficult work of the next grade should be promoted.
 
School districts must assist schools and teachers to implement research-based reading activities
that have been shown to be successful in teaching reading to low-performing students.
 
Good Cause Exemptions from Mandatory Retention
 
The school district may exempt students in grade 3 who demonstrate a continued deficiency in
reading from mandatory retention only for good cause. These good cause exemptions are now
specified in statute and are limited to the following:
1.
 
limited English proficient students who have had less than two years of instruction in an
English for Speakers of Other Languages program
2.
 
students with disabilities, whose individual educational plan (IEP) indicates that
participation in statewide assessment is not appropriate, consistent with the requirements of
State Board of Education rule
3.
 
students who demonstrate an acceptable level of performance on an alternative standardized
reading assessment approved by the State Board of Education
4.
 
students who demonstrate, through a student portfolio, that they are reading on grade level as
evidenced by demonstration of mastery of the Sunshine State Standards in reading equal to at
least a Level 2 performance on FCAT
5.
 
students with disabilities who participate in FCAT and who have an individual educational
plan or a Section 504 plan that reflects that they have received intensive remediation in
reading for more than two years but still demonstrate a deficiency in reading and were
previously retained in grades K, 1, or 2
6.
 
Third-grade students who have received intensive remediation in reading for two or more
years but still have deficiency in reading and were previously retained in K, grade 1, or grade
2 for a total of two years. If promoted under this exemption, intensive reading instruction
must include an altered instructional day based on an AIP that includes specialized diagnostic
information and specific reading strategies.
 
Districts may use this or similar good cause language at other grades and for other subjects, but it
is not required by statute.
 
PLAZA LEVEL – 08, THE CAPITOL – TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0400 – (850) 413-0555 – FAX (850) 488-2869
http:/www.firn.edu/doe
An affirmative action/equal opportunity employer
 

 
 
August 26, 2002
Page Six
 
 
 
Requests for good cause exemptions from the mandatory retention in grade 3 based on
performance demonstrated by a state-approved alternative reading assessment or by portfolio (#3
and #4 above) must be consistent with the following:
Documentation must be submitted by the student's teacher to the principal that indicates that
the promotion of the student is appropriate and is based upon the student's academic record.
In order to minimize paperwork requirements, such documentation can consist only of the
existing AIP, IEP, if applicable, report card, or student portfolio. While not mentioned
specifically in the law, LEP Student Plans and alternate test scores would also be appropriate
documentation.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The principal must review and discuss the recommendation with the teacher and determine
promotion or retention. If the principal determines that the student should be promoted, the
principal must make the recommendation in writing to the superintendent.
The superintendent must accept or reject the principal's recommendation in writing.
 
Annual Reports
 
Each school district continues to be required to report annually to the parent of
each
student the
progress of the student towards achieving state and school district expectations for proficiency in
reading, writing, science, and mathematics, including the student's results on each statewide
assessment test. The evaluation of each student's progress for this report must be based on
classroom work, observations, tests, district and state assessments, and other relevant
information. Progress reporting must be provided to the parent in writing in a format adopted by
the school board.
 
The new law now provides that each school district must annually publish in a local newspaper
and report in writing to the State Board of Education by September 1 of each year, beginning
with 2003, the following information on the prior school year:
the provisions of the law relating to public school student progression
(Only those portions of
the law relating to student progression need to be published in the newspaper.)
the school district’s policies and procedures on student retention and promotion
(Only those
portions of the student progression plan relating to retention and promotion need to be
published in the newspaper.)
 
by grade, the number and percentage of all students in grades 3-10 performing at Levels 1
and 2 on the reading portion of the FCAT
by grade, the number and percentage of all students retained in grades 3 through 10
 
 
information on the total number of students who were promoted for good cause
by each
category
of good cause
PLAZA LEVEL – 08, THE CAPITOL – TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0400 – (850) 413-0555 – FAX (850) 488-2869
http:/www.firn.edu/doe
An affirmative action/equal opportunity employer
 

 
August 26, 2002
Page Seven
 
 
 
any revisions to the school district’s policy on student retention and promotion from the prior
year.
 
 
Copies of the districts’ published report in the local newspaper and their revised student
progression plans will need to be sent to the Department of Education (DOE). This information,
along with FCAT and student retention data, will be reported by DOE to the State Board of
Education.
 
State Board Enforcement Authority and Responsibilities
 
The law now provides the State Board of Education with the authority to enforce this statute.
 
Department of Education Technical Assistance
 
The law also requires the DOE to provide technical assistance as needed to assist districts. To
provide such assistance, enclosed are the following:
 
 
technical assistance paper
 
one-page fact sheet on expectations for third-grade students: reading and student progression
 
PowerPoint presentation
 
In the next few weeks, DOE will also provide:
 
 
sample notice to parents, in English and Spanish
 
expanded technical assistance papers including issues regarding students with disabilities and
students with limited English proficiency
 
“model” student progression plan (your director of student services received a DRAFT of
this document in the spring)
 
parent information booklet
 
resources for teachers to use in identifying and remediating reading deficiencies
 
sample academic improvement plan
 
The Department of Education is introducing an alternative to bulk mail communications to districts
and schools. We are excited about this project because it will not only reduce the amount of paper
and postage used, it will increase our ability to communicate with you. Please review the attachment
PLAZA LEVEL – 08, THE CAPITOL – TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0400 – (850) 413-0555 – FAX (850) 488-2869
http:/www.firn.edu/doe
An affirmative action/equal opportunity employer
 

PLAZA LEVEL – 08, THE CAPITOL – TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0400 – (850) 413-0555 – FAX (850) 488-2869
http:/www.firn.edu/doe
An affirmative action/equal opportunity employer
 
August 26, 2002
Page Eight
 
 
 
 
to this memorandum regarding how to register and receive electronic communications from the
department.
 
Enclosures
BC/mtt
 
cc: Assistant Superintendents for Instruction
Student Services Directors
Guidance Contacts
 

Back to top