FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
    ?
    STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
    ?
    JIM HORNE
    Commissioner of Education
    F. PHILIP HANDY,
    Chairman
    T. WILLARD FAIR,
    Vice Chairman
    Members
    LINDA J. EADS, ED.D.
    CHARLES PATRICK GARCÍA
    JULIA L. JOHNSON
    WILLIAM L. PROCTOR, PH.D.
    LINDA K. TAYLOR
    MEMORANDUM
    TO:
    ?
    District School Superintendents
    Community
    College
    Presidents
    FROM:
    ?
    Sharon Koon
    DATE:
    ?
    March 11, 2004
    SUBJECT:
    ?
    District Interinstitutional Articulation Agreements
    Section 1007.235(2), Florida Statutes, requires that the “district interinstitutional articulation
    agreement for each school year must be completed before high school registration for the fall
    term of the following school year.” As required by law, the Department of Education will be
    reviewing all updated agreements, and copies will be requested from each district in May.
    The second page of this memo outlines the components that must be contained in your
    agreement, along with some hints for successfully negotiating an agreement that provides for
    maximum access, while finding win-win solutions to financial challenges. The Office of
    Articulation is available to provide technical assistance as you develop your agreement. You may
    contact Dr. Laura Hébert in the Office of Articulation at Laura.Hebert@fldoe.org or by phone at
    850-245-9558.
    Cc: Community College Council on Instructional Affairs Vice Presidents
    Assistant Superintendents for Instruction
    High School Principals
    Articulation Officers
    Sharon Koon
    Director
    Office of Articulation
    325 W. GAINES STREET • SUITE 1401 • TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-0400 • (850) 245-0427 • www.fldoe.org

    1.
    the school district.
    2.
    including a pl
    ƒ
     
    ƒ
     
    ƒ
     
    ƒ
     
    ƒ
     
    ƒ
     
    ƒ
     
    ƒ
     
    ƒ
     
    3.
    ƒ
     
    ƒ
     
    An analysis of problems and corrective actions.
    ƒ
      
    ƒ
     
    ƒ
     
    education and secondary-level corrective actions.
    ƒ
     
    4.
    5.
    f
    elementary, middle, and high school teachers.
    ƒ
     
    f
    f an
    semester.
    l
    ƒ
     
    i
    If, for example,
    ished. With
    ƒ
     
    There is a statewide Dual Enrollment
    Future Education Handbook. This list provides hi
    The
    course offerings.
    ƒ
     
    Deadlines.
    i
    parents are given conflicti
    school and the college.
    @
    g
    It’s that time! A copy of your
    updated Agreement will be
    requested by the Department
    of Education in May. The following components, at a minimum, must
    be contained in your agreement:
    A ratification of all existing articulation agreements between the community college and
    Courses and programs available to students eligible to participate in dual enrollment,
    an for the community college to provide guidance services.
    The process by which parents and students are notified of the option to participate.
    The process by which students and parents exercise their option to participate.
    High school credits earned for completion of a dual enrollment course.
    High school graduation requirements met through completion of dual enrollment
    courses.
    Eligibility criteria for student participation in dual enrollment courses and programs.
    Institutional responsibilities for student screening prior to enrollment, and monitoring
    of enrolled students.
    Criteria by which the quality of dual enrollment courses and programs are to be
    judged and maintained.
    Institutional responsibilities for the cost of dual enrollment courses and programs.
    Responsibility for providing student transportation.
    Mechanisms and strategies for reducing the incidence of postsecondary remediation in
    math, reading, and writing for first-time-enrolled recent high school graduates.
    Mechanisms currently being initiated.
    Anticipated outcomes.
    Strategies for the better preparation of students upon graduation from high school.
    An analysis of costs associated with the implementation of postsecondary remedial
    The identification of strategies for reducing costs of the delivery of postsecondary
    remediation for recent high school graduates.
    Mechanisms and strategies for promoting "tech prep" programs of study.
    A plan that outlines the mechanisms and strategies for improving the preparation o
    Helpful Hints
    The dual enrollment component of the agreement represents a significant
    portion of the overall agreement and generally proves to be among the most
    difficult sections to effectively negotiate. A strong dual enrollment agreement
    protects both the students and the institutions, provides win-win solutions to
    financial challenges, and allows for maximum access. Districts that report
    the greatest satisfaction with their dual enrollment programs typically have
    successfully negotiated:
    Cost-sharing for the “cost o instruction”.
    For a pure dual enrollment class, each
    entity can contribute toward the cost of the instructor (for example, half the cost o
    adjunct if it’s a community college instructor, or half the cost of a teaching overload if it’s
    a high school teacher). Each entity can bill the other accordingly, at the end of each
    A good mix of community col ege instructors and high school teachers will
    provide for a balance in the funds paid out and those received.
    Textbook Adoption Timetables.
    While school d stricts are responsible for the purchase
    of their students’ textbooks, the two entities can come to an agreement on a reasonable
    length of time for the use of “class sets” of dual enrollment textbooks.
    districts can be guaranteed use of a set of textbooks for 3 years from the time of
    purchase, the enormous cost associated with textbooks can be greatly dimin
    the exception of those areas with rapidly changing technology (which can be specified in
    the agreement), most academic texts can be used effectively for much longer than they
    typically are used. Though this may involve compromise on the part of the instructors, it
    does not compromise the quality or integrity of the course.
    Courses to be Made Available to Students.
    Course Equivalency List that is available on the DOE web site and in the Counseling for
    gh school credit transfer guarantees, as
    well as Bright Futures subject area equivalencies for hundreds of college courses.
    list is a great starting point, but should not be viewed as the limits of dual enrollment
    Courses to be offered beyond the state list (with their locally
    designated high school credit equivalencies) should be clearly delineated.
    Procedures for participation, along w th firmly established deadlines, are
    essential to the agreement. Confusion and frustration often occur when students or
    ng information about procedures and deadlines from the high
    Without an official resource, parents seek resolution with their
    school board, the college president, or the DOE, none of which has the ability to single-
    handedly make these decisions.
    If you need assistance with your articulation agreement contact
    Dr. Laura Hébert at Laura.Hebert
    fldoe.or
    or 850-245-9558.
    Have You Updated Your Interinstitutional
    Articulation Agreement?
    Section 1007.235(2), Florida Statutes, requires “The district interinstitutional articulation
    agreement for each school year must be completed before high school registration for the fall
    term of the following school year.”

    Back to top